Showing posts with label Jim Jordan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jim Jordan. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Obama "mobilizing" and "leveraging" $1 billion for Jordanian economic development

It was just a quick little statement after President Obama's meeting with Jordan's King Abdullah today:
"I'm pleased to announce that we have mobilized several hundreds of millions of dollars through OPIC, and that will leverage ultimately about $1 billion for economic development inside of Jordan. In addition, because of the huge spike in commodity prices throughout the world, we are going to be providing 50,000 metric tons of wheat to Jordan. All of this will help to stabilize the cost of living and day-to-day situation of Jordanians and will provide a foundation so that these economic reforms can move forward and long-term development can take place. So we're very happy to be partnering with His Majesty on that issue."
When I first heard the statement on Fox News, I thought he said the money would be leveraged through "OPEC" but after reading the transcript, I see that the president was referring to OPIC, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation.  It claims to be:
"[t]he U.S. Government's development finance institution. It mobilizes private capital to help solve critical world challenges and in doing so, advances U.S. foreign policy. Because OPIC works with the U.S. private sector, it helps U.S. businesses gain footholds in emerging markets catalyzing revenues, jobs and growth opportunities both at home and abroad."
It also claims it was:
"[E]stablished as an agency of the U.S. Government in 1971, OPIC operates on a self-sustaining basis at no net cost to American taxpayers."
A government agency that operates at no net cost to the American taxpayers?  Forgive me if I'm a bit skeptical. 

So back to Obama "mobilizing" OPIC dollars.  The State department released a report today detailing U.S. aid to Jordan.  It includes:

  • $463 million FY 2010 in USAID funds (includes $194 million cash transfer to assist the Jordanian government in retiring its foreign debt).
  • $303.8 million FY 2010 in military assistance.
  • $24.6 million FY 2010 Nonproliferation, antiterrorism, demining, and related programs.
  • $1.5 million FY 2010 International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement.
  • $600,000 FY 2010 Civil Society Programs.
  • $275.1 million October 2010 Millennium Challenge Corporation (clean water compact). 
  • $400 million (planned) OPIC Investment Programs (financing to "mobilize" $1 billion of development projects in Jordan).
That's roughly a billion dollars in aid we sent to Jordan last year, not including the "no net cost" OPIC money.  This aid is essentially a payoff for them to remain at peace with Israel and to be a good role model to other Middle Eastern countries.  


Can we be really honest here?  This is not about humanitarian aid.  While Jordan is experiencing some difficult economic times, it's hardly Sudan or Somalia.  In fact, a Jordanian Chamber of Commerce-style website boasts:

  • Jordan is among the region’s highest spenders on education, investing more than 20.4% of our GDP to enable a labor force tailored to meet the demands of the modern market. 
  • Jordan’s literacy rate of 91% is among the highest in the Middle East.
  • Beginning in elementary school, Jordanian children learn English and Computer skills ;( in preparation for IT training at the secondary level.) 
  • Jordan produces over 6,000 IT graduates every year
  • An efficiently, productive workforce. We spend 4.2% of our GDP to guarantee the well being of our citizens- more than any other country in the region. Life expectancy and public health levels in Jordan are comparable to the West with 70% of the population on medical insurance.
  • Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Report in 2003, ranked Jordanian students scores to be 22 points above international average in science and mathematics.
  • Superb housing at the most competitive rates in the Middle East.
  • Excellent medical facilities with Western trained physicians
  • A wide range of international schools.
  • Broadband connectivity in the major cities.
Though Jordan has few natural resources and isn't sitting on oil reserves like other Middle Eastern countries, it's hardly a third-world, desolate wasteland.  


For many years, conservatives have accepted these payouts to countries like Jordan without batting an eye, thinking that it was a necessary evil in the name of "peacekeeping" and "nation building."  And we have a vested interest in Israel - she is our ally and the only democracy in the Middle East.  We must not allow Israel to be shoved into the sea as her enemies have been trying to do since Israel gained its independence in 1948.  If that happens, the spread and escalation of radical Islam in the world will be something unprecedented in history.


But do these payouts actually work? Are they helping?  When I see that we gave Jordan $194 million to retire their foreign debt it tells me that their government is as fiscally irresponsible as ours is.  Think about this:  


We borrowed $194 million to send to Jordan so they could pay off their foreign debts and added  it to our own national debt!


In whose universe is that even slightly reasonable?  


We also give $1.5 billion to Egypt and $3.1 billion to Pakistan.  It's anybody's guess whether these countries are our friends.  If they are, it may change next week.  The only thing that's clear is that they lean Islamic-totalitarian-dictator-ish in political philosophy and we can trust them about as far as we can throw a Muhammad statue (that is if you could actually create one of those in Egypt or Pakistan and then manage to toss it without having your head forcibly removed by the authorities or local frenzied mob). 


The question that vexes me is how and when bribery came to be a synonym for diplomacy.  We've completely ceded our status as a world power when our only bargaining chip is cash, which we seem to be completely out of right now. 








 

Saturday, March 19, 2011

March 19, 2011



We welcomed Ryan home from Hillsdale College last night.  He sat down for a quick dinner (Bolyard Burgers, on the grill!), unloaded a carload of laundry, and headed off to Bible study with his dad.  He also left me with a reading assignment from his American Heritage Reader, compiled by the Hillsdale College History Faculty.  It's a collection (882 pages) of  important documents and writings from Colonial times thru Reagan.   Ryan was so excited about what he's been learning that he wanted to share it with me, which is music to a homeschooling mom's heart.  My assignment:  "The Great Nation of Futurity" by John Louis O'Sullivan (1813-1895).  It contains this quote about our country:
"We have had patriots to defend our homes, our liberties, but no aspirants to crowns or thrones; nor have the American people ever suffered themselves to be led on by wicked ambition to de-populate the land, to spread desolation far and wide, that a human being might be placed on a seat of supremacy."
Our nation has truly been blessed! In light of what we've seen in the Middle East in recent months and looking across the whole of history, we are indeed unique and exceptional. 


Baptist Press - Disaster pushes Japanese beyond secular thinking
 ...Proud of their secular society, most Japanese are not religious. But in a time of crisis, International Mission Board missionary Gary Fujino says they tend to fall back on an old Japanese expression, 'The god that you depend on in times of crisis.'
'What that means is when things are bad, you will go to the temple and shrine because nothing you've tried thus far worked,' Fujino explains. He notes that, once the crisis is over, no one goes back to the temple or shrine. 
Thousands of prayer tablets hung in one-day testify that the crisis in Japan continues to grow and people are trying to find ways to cope...
They really believe that in themselves they have what they need, which makes it very difficult to share the Gospel' Fujino says. 'What we need is for people to be shaken and realize that you need something outside of yourself -- God'...
'I learned in the Kobe earthquake that I needed God. I learned that I don't need material things. My heart opened up,' she says. 'I think God saved me back then because He wants to use me now.'...
...She explains that the Japanese government will take care of things and rebuild houses in a few months, but she can do something even bigger -- introduce people to the God who can rebuild their lives.   'I have a really strong God,' she says. 'I want those people in the disaster to know my God's strength and power.'
Dorsey cannot make it to the disaster zone yet because of radiation fears, not to mention the lack of government permits, but she's doing what she can in Tokyo. From her church just a few miles from the Shinto shrine, she prays for her country. Dorsey's prayers are different than those hanging in the shrine. Hers are not 'wishes' or 'hopes.' She knows her God personally and knows He will provide."

Somehow, I knew this was coming.  The Radiation Network has real-time updates from Gieger counters across the country. The map is refreshed every minute of the day for those who are having trouble sleeping without knowing what the radiation level is.  According to the website, "alert level" is 100 counts per minute (CPM), so it looks like we're in good shape, for now. 



Public Policy Polling surveyed 400 Republican "usual primary voters" last week and asked the following:

If the Republican candidates for President in  2012 were Haley Barbour, Mitch Daniels, Newt 
Gingrich, Mike Huckabee, Sarah Palin, Ron  Paul, Tim Pawlenty, and Mitt Romney who 
would you vote for?


Haley Barbour  2% 
.................................................
Mitch Daniels  4% 
..................................................
Newt Gingrich 16% 
.................................................
Mike Huckabee 19% 
...............................................
Sarah Palin 15% 
.....................................................
Ron Paul  7% 
.........................................................
Tim Pawlenty  5% 
..................................................
Mitt Romney 18% 
....................................................
Someone else/Undecided 13%



Given the choices of Ken Blackwell, Drew Carey, Jon Husted, Shannon Jones, Jim Jordan, Steve LaTourette, Josh Mandel, and  Mary Taylor who would you most like to see as 
the Republican candidate for Senate next year?


Ken Blackwell 17% 
.................................................
Drew Carey 12% 
.....................................................
Jon Husted 14% 
......................................................
Shannon Jones  1% 
...............................................
Jim Jordan  8% 
......................................................
Steve LaTourette  8% 
.............................................
Josh Mandel 6% 
...................................................
Mary Taylor 9% 
.....................................................
Someone else/Undecided 25%


Drew Carey?  Really?  Did people think they were voting for John Kerry? They asked the same question again without Carey in the mix and got the following results:



Ken Blackwell 
21% 

.................................................
Jon Husted 14% 
......................................................
Shannon Jones  4% 
...............................................
Jim Jordan 10% 
......................................................
Steve LaTourette 10% 
.............................................
Josh Mandel 
 7% 

...................................................
Mary Taylor
 8% 

.....................................................
Someone else/Undecided 26%

It's interesting that Ken Blackwell, Ohio's former Secretary of State received so many votes.  He's a solid conservative who challenged Michael Steele for the GOP Chairmanship a couple years ago.  Considering his name hasn't been in the news much, it's a strong showing.  Jim Jordan has said he plans to stay in the House, where he leads the conservative Republican Study Committee.  It's notable that there are a lot of undecided votes up for grabs.

They also asked:

Would you describe yourself as very liberal, somewhat liberal, moderate, somewhat 
conservative, or very conservative?


Very liberal 1% 
......................................................
Somewhat liberal 3% 
............................................
Moderate 16% 
.........................................................
Somewhat conservative 46% 
..................................
Very conservative 34%


80% of  Republican "usual primary voters" consider themselves conservatives.  Lawmakers and candidates, listen up!  RINOs need not apply.  


Wisconsin lawmaker hit by property damage - JSOnline
"The office of Sen. Dan Kapanke (R-La Crosse) said the senator has been subjected to damage of personal property and has received threatening statements in the wake of mass protests in recent weeks over Gov. Scott Walker’s budget-repair bill.
Kapanke have been unavailable, but an aide to Kapanke says that windows on Kapanke's car were broken in Madison and the senator's wife found nails strewn on the driveway of their home."
This is what democracy looks like?


Germany's Eco-Trap: Is Environmentalism Really Working? - SPIEGEL ONLINE
This article in Spiegel Online demonstrates what happens in the headlong rush into ill-conceived environmental policies:


E10 (ethanol) Fuel:
"Many haven't yet fully realized that E10 is an ecological swindle. People who want to help the environment shouldn't use it. Nine large European environmental associations recently conducted a joint study which concluded that the bottom line impact of the fuel on the environment is negative. Rainforests are being clear-cut in Brazil and Borneo to make room for sugarcane and oil palm cultivation. At the same time there's a shortage of arable land for food production, which is leading to the threat of famine in parts of the world. Last year, the price of grain rose sharply in the global market."
 Recycling:
"Under German law, only 36 percent of plastic rubbish has to be recycled. The remainder can be sold for a profit, for example to plants that burn rubbish to produce heating or power. Such facilities are everywhere in Germany. Municipalities across the country built then in response to a ban on storing garbage in landfills. Indeed, now there are far too many of them in Germany -- and there is a shortage of burnable waste.
The result is that firms are buying up as much plastic waste -- which burns well due to the high quantity of oil in plastics -- as they can get their hands on. Indeed, some companies have even resorted to importing plastic waste to burn -- hardly a contribution to an environmental utopia."
Water Conservation:
"The Germans are obsessed with saving water. You won't find many countries north of the Sahara that are as water-conscious as Germany. They save water while washing dishes (a modern dishwashing machine uses only six liters per cycle), while going to the toilet (many toilets have a setting that allows only a brief flush), and even when washing their cars....
..."And water conservation in Germany can be harmful -- particularly when it comes to the sewage systems beneath German cities. The lack of waste water flowing through the canalization means that fat, faeces and discarded food aren't getting flushed out enough, and are corroding the walls. To compensate, utilities are forced to pump hundreds of thousands of liters of fresh water through the system to keep it operable..."
Insulation:
"By rights, the venerable town of Weimar with its beautiful old architecture should be forbidden. None of the buildings meet modern standards of heating insulation. The walls are too thin, the windows aren't properly sealed, the place is a disaster in terms of energy efficiency. Politicians in Berlin have ensure that the situation will soon improve. By 2050, all buildings in Germany must be carbon neutral, according to the government's energy plan presented last year. 'If we take that legislation seriously, we would have to tear down half the town,' says Weimar Mayor Stefan Wolf....
 ...Across the country, insulating panels are going up on the outside of myriad buildings. With older buildings making up a quarter of the country's housing stock, there seems to be little other choice...
Another problems is that well-insulated buildings don't breathe -- no outside air gets in and CO2 can build up quickly inside as a result. So can mould. Installing air vents can be exorbitant."

World's Guiltiest Dog.  Poor Denver....shoulda left those kitty cat treats alone!