Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Free the Cleveland 5 - Occupy Cleveland Supports Its Own

Despite their statements to the press and on their website attempting to distance the group from the five suspected terrorists who were members of Occupy Cleveland, their presence in court on Monday sent a different message. Members of the Occupy Cleveland community showed up in force today to support the "Cleveland 5" for their first day in court. According to Scene (a local hipster publication):

"By the time the hearing got moving, the rows in the courtroom were at capacity, the overflow against the walls. In the half hour or so before the proceedings began, the hallway outside the chamber was filled with about 60 people. And although adults were sprinkled throughout the group, the majority were young, most hovering around 25 and looking the part. "It could have been a crowd waiting for a college lecture to start, coming in all the twentysomething shapes and sizes. Their haircuts ranged from tidy salon chops to slam pit shaves, ropey dreads to the watercolor shades of a kitchen dye job; beards both undergrad wispy and woodsy thick; skate shoes and loafers; a pair of handmade “Free the Cleveland 5” shirts; heart-a-gram decorated jean jackets; discount bin sport coats studded with slogan buttons; baggy graduation suits that would have fit a few years back; new dress shirts still vertically creased from where they were recently folded on a store shelf."
In addition, more evidence has surfaced tying the suspects to the group in substantive roles. Anthony "Tony" Hayne signed the lease on the $600/month, 2400 sq. ft. warehouse space the group had been leasing to shack up when they were not working a shift at the tent on Cleveland's Public Square (before the city revoked their permit this week). Tony, the self-proclaimed anarchist, who posted as "Anthony8547" on the Occupy Cleveland Forum in February offered to pay the utilities himself, providing the group followed his strict rules (a neo-anarchist?):

RULES: 1.  Dry camp 2.  no more than 16 hrs at a time there.(resident occupiers will be doing 8 hr shifts at    the info tent) 3:  Clean up after yourself 4:  Non- Violence
Good anarchists are hard to find these days. You can't make this stuff up.

 Here's a video of Tony Hayne facilitating a "General Assembly" on 2/13/12. Tony, on the left hand side of the screen, wearing a black stocking cap and holding a cup of coffee, tells the group that they "got the warehouse" and that "today I brought the checks to the guy":

    

Below is a video showing bombing suspect Brandon Baxter leading a General Assembly on April 11th. The nice young man/community organizer has been keeping up on all the local protests, including those for Trayvon Martin, Justice for Janitors ("a cool day for us to be down here"), striking Red Cross workers, and three tax day protests (RED ALERT! He's a Tea Party member!!). Unfortunately, the sound cuts out about 5 minutes into the video, but it's clear that young Brandon is a leader of the pack:

  
 

As I documented here last week, these two have been members and leaders of this group from the beginning.

Note that Occupy Cleveland is featuring a video of Brandon Baxter's arrest as a member of Occupy Cleveland on the front page of its website. I also noted here last week that Cleveland City Councilman Brian Cummins has been in cahoots with Occupy Cleveland since Day 1 of the protests.  He admitted last week that he not only knew the bombing suspects, but he worked alongside them. Now, he is attempting to distance himself from the men and the movement itself, saying:

"This is a horrific example in terms of the arrests of how the movement itself failed to identify and understand the dangerous potential of people affiliated with it."
Doesn't he mean it's a horrific example of how HE failed to identify and understand the dangerous potential of people HE was aiding and abetting? No word on whether Cummins was in attendance at the court hearing for the bombing suspects or if he is sporting a "Free the Cleveland 5" t-shirt at Cleveland City Council meetings.

Cross-posted at RedState

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Cleveland Bombing Suspect Featured Today on Occupy Cleveland Website

Although Occupy Cleveland has a nice little statement on its website attempting to distance the group from the terror suspects who were active members of the group,  directly below the statement is a video hailing the actions of suspected would-be bomber and Cleveland Occupy leader Brandon Baxter for his March 5th arrest. From the Occupy Cleveland site:
"On the morning of March 5th, Occupy Cleveland, in conjunction with labor and community organizations, marched from Public Square to the Justice Center. Every Monday morning, in a room on the first floor, there is a sheriff auction of foreclosed properties. Our aim was to shut it down. 5 very brave young men (Peter, Jonnie,Brandon, James and Ston) waited in the room where the auction was taking place for their cue...All five were arrested before they finished the mic check, but the demonstrators outside picked it up and made so much noise that people inside couldn’t hear what was going on. The demonstrators were eventually moved from the area right outside the sale, to the sidewalk, but we rallied on that sidewalk for approx. 2 hours. We may not have been successful in shutting it down completely, but we definitely brought a lot of attention to the issue, handing out flyers to everyone who walked by. The 5 were eventually cited for disorderly conduct and released. We celebrated their release, shouted “See ya next week!” to the Sheriff’s deputies, and marched back to the tent."
The Plain Dealer reports that Baxter was arrested for disorderly conduct, skipped his court appearance, and was arrested again the first week of April.  He later pleaded no contest and was sentenced to 200 hours of community service. What? Occupying isn't considered community service? Couldn't fellow-Occupier, City Councilman Brian Cummins work something out? Baxter said at the time:

"I took the risk of getting arrested because I feel the powers that be, whoever they might be -- on all levels of government and those who hold corporate power -- are not listening because not enough people are actually taking a stance" against foreclosures. "I was hoping that this would be a great way to get Cleveland more involved by showing the potential that a small group of dedicated people can have in making an impact. Even though we are not in any government position or in Congress, we do have the power."
Apparently, Occupy Cleveland is so proud of their leader and his arrest for their cause that they don't mind featuring him on their front page along with their denouncement of his tactics. Ironic, isn't it? Below are screen shots of the current Occupy Cleveland front page and the section of the YouTube video where Baxter appears (at the end).  I've also embedded the full YouTube video of the protest at the end.



Brandon Baxter addresses the crowd

Cleveland City Councilman Worked With Terror Suspects in Occupy Camp

Cleveland Magazine has just posted an interview from the tents at Public Square in Cleveland with the shell-shocked reaction of the remaining Occupiers on receiving news that their comrades had been arrested for plotting to blow up an area bridge. As I posted earlier today, the men have a clear link to the Occupy Cleveland movement and this article confirms that all five men were regular visitors to the Occupy Cleveland tent in downtown Cleveland.

“I know all those gentlemen – I don’t want to call them gentlemen anymore,” said movement member Robin Adelmann. Some of them spent time with him, manning the tent. “I never really expected that from any of them.”
One Occupier disputes the FBI account of the night of the October 21st arrests, when the FBI says the bomb plotters were trying to stir up violence in the crowd:

"Matthew Revelt, a Cleveland protester who said he was in Public Square on Oct. 21, said the affidavit’s description was accurate, except that the anarchists didn’t advocate violence. “They wanted to get people to get rowdy. They wanted to get people to get loud. They didn’t ask people to act destructive. We might’ve all turned on them [if they had]. They wanted people to get arrested that evening. They wanted to encourage that.”
Cleveland's New Channel 5 reports on the high level of their involvement:


What is perhaps most disturbing is that Cleveland City Councilman Brian Cummins, a vocal and active Occupy supporter, admits that he knew and worked alongside the suspects, even admitting that he knew they were anarchists:

“They wore their anarchist beliefs on their shirt much more than anyone else did,” Cummins said. Baxter and Stafford didn’t talk to him, probably because he was an elected official, Cummings said. “None were very much involved with the strategy of the movement,” Cummins said. “They were more fringe members of the group. People were perturbed with them occasionally.” Like the guys in the tent today, Cummins had begun hearing that Hayne was a “troublemaker, a pain in the ass.” The councilman noted that the Occupy Movement’s open, often leaderless nature makes it hard to kick people out.


Cummins, a member of the Green Party, has been an integral part of Occupy Cleveland's activities since the movement began. He was present on the first day of the "Occupation," offering advice about dealing with the city's laws and regulations and helping them to secure the required permits. In October he invited his Occupier comrades for a personal visit to Cleveland City Hall (I wrote about the field trip here):

"According to #OccupyCleveland, they were personally invited to Cleveland's weekly city council meeting last night by Ward 14 councilman Brian Cummins. He is the only non-Democrat among the 19 council members — he is a Green. According to #OccupyCleveland, "Members of the group received a tour of the grounds and sat in on a City Council meeting that turned out to be mainly about them. The group received a rousing round of applause, as well as the endorsements of many key Council members. 
"Cities are going into default, states are going into default, and yet when people go to Congress we're not too big to fail, only banks are too big to fail," says Westbrook. 
"The #OccupyCleveland folks shared, "Councilman Cummins made sure to highlight the group’s excellent working relationship with the Cleveland Police Department and its relentless commitment to the consensus process. Councilman Jay Westbrook of Ward 16 expressed his delight to see such a diverse group engaging in their First Amendment rights. Councilwoman Mamie Mitchell of Ward 6 said that she is inspired by the way the movement is engaging in democracy. Councilman Zach Reed of Ward 2 stressed that Cleveland is an important place to see this movement prosper. He was especially impressed with #OccupyCleveland’s steadfast dedication to nonviolence and peaceable assembly." 
"Mayor Frank Jackson was also in attendance, seen shaking hands and smiling for #OccupyCleveland’s live feed of the event. The group later received endorsements from Council President Martin Sweeney of Ward 18, Councilman Matt Zone of Ward 15 and Councilman Joe Cimperman of Ward 3."
Apparently, though, the FBI doesn't see any connection between the Occupy groups and the terror suspects:

"Let me be clear, the FBI and Department of Justice are not conducting an investigation of any specific group," said Steven M. Dettelbach, U.S Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio. "We do not investigate movements or groups, we investigate individuals."
Personally, as someone who sends her husband to work in Cleveland every day, I would like them to be a bit more curious...no...a LOT more curious about what is going on in these camps and how many more violent anarchists they are harboring among them. Someone needs to be asking the leaders of Occupy Cleveland a few basic questions about exactly what level of violence they are willing to tolerate and at what point they would be willing to contact the authorities.  Would they have called authorities if they knew what "Tony, Connor, Brandon, Doug and Skelly" had been considering? I'm not convinced that they would have. I must repeat what I posted in my earlier post: there are known members of the group who are vocally opposed to turning criminals over to the police. From the Occupy Cleveland forum:

"Some of us are morally opposed to handing someone over to the cops and consider it a violent act…I can tell you for a fact that at least one other prominent Occupier is strongly opposed to calling police, for the same reasons stated here. Even when someone has committed violence, this person says, putting them through the criminal justice system only imposes more violence.”
And that terrifies me.

Occupy Cleveland Turns to Terror



Meet Cleveland Occupier Brandon Baxter.  A few weeks ago he was one of the few remaining protesters manning the shabby Occupation tent on Cleveland's Public Square. Today he was arrested for plotting to blow up a major bridge in the Cuyahoga Valley National Recreation Area.


Anthony Hayne is another member of Occupy Cleveland. He was highlighted in an October, 2011 story in the Lakewood Patch about his work trying to spread Occupy Cleveland to the suburb of Lakewood.

This is my home turf.  I grew up not far from the bridge they plotted to blow up and my husband works in downtown Cleveland, very close to the other potential targets this group discussed. I attended the original Occupy Cleveland event and reported it here at RedState and also reported the rape of a teen girl in the camp and the group's field trip to Cleveland City Council, where their received a hero's welcome. This is personal for me. Make no mistake. These individuals were associated with Occupy Cleveland and the self-proclaimed anarchists have the EXACT SAME COMPLAINTS as the Occupy movement.  The FBI complaint, which contains conversations between the suspects and an undercover agent are filled with the language of the Occupy movement and in fact, the suspects were originally identified at an Occupy event in Cleveland.   Here are some details taken from the FBI complaint:

[CHS = Confidential Human Source    UCE = Undercover Employee]

"Based on an initial report of potential criminal activity and threats involving anarchists who would be attending an event by a protest group, the Cleveland FBI directed the CHS to attend that event. On October 21, 2011, approximately 6:30 pm, and while the CHS was attending the event, the CHS identified four suspicious males with walkie-talkie radios around their necks. Three of the four men had masks or something covering their faces; one man did not. The men were wearing black or dark colored shirts, had black backpacks, carried the anarchist flags and acted differently than the other people in attendance. The four males were subsequently joined by three more males wearing scarves or towels around their heads. The whole group appeared to be together and was constantly moving throughout the crowd expressing displeasure at the crowd's unwillingness to act violently. During a briefing between the protestors and organizers, the organizers explained who would be arrested emphasizing that they wanted to conduct peaceful civil disobedience. One of the original four men turned away and said "f-k that" before the group of men walked away."
 
Here's a clip of the 10/21 protest in Cleveland (no time stamp):

  

Twenty protesters were arrested that night for violating the city's ban on overnight camping. Though I have been unable to track down the names of those arrested (The Cleveland Plain Dealer did not think it was newsworthy to report the names), there was a photo of the criminals when they appeared in court:


Occupy Cleveland protesters in court Saturday

Are the terror suspects among those arrested? I don't know, but a couple of them bear a resemblance to those charged in the terror plot.

Cleveland anarchists

After the informant made contact with one of the anarchists he met at the 10/21 Occupy Cleveland event, he set up meetings with Doug Wright, and eventually, the other suspects.  Here is some of the information gleaned from the investigation:

"Wright explained to the CHS that he and a group of anarchists Wright recruited had been discussing plans involving violence and destruction to physical property in a variety of ways in order to send a message to corporations and the United States government." 
"The group of five to six men...wanted to knock the bank signs off the tops of the larger buildings in downtown Cleveland....they needed to make sure everyone knows that the actions was against corporate America and the financial system, and not just some random acts." 
"Wright and Baxter decided that doing some kind of attack during the opening of the new Casino in Cleveland would make a good statement. Baxter went on to talk about the G-8 in chicago and the Republican convention in Tampa." 
BAXTER:  “Taking out the bridge in the business district would cost the...um...would cost the corporate bigwigs a lot of money not just because of structural damage to the bridge but because it’s going to stop a lot of people going to work.”
The conversation then switches gears on March 31st when Baxter, obviously distracted by his work as an Occupier/Community Organizer, complains about the City of Cleveland denying his request for a permit. He makes clear that there is overlap between the anarchists and the Occupiers:

"Baxter then discussed the fact that he believes the city of Cleveland is going to give him a difficult time about acquiring a permit for an upcoming festival. He wants to march on city hall. Baxter said, “I’m going to straight up tell the city we are not playing by your f--king rules.” 
"He continued by saying he knew the city was trying to shut them down and that, “if you shut it down we will blow it wide open.” Baxter was also upset because he is presenting the festival as a family friendly event and the city will not support them. When asked about comments Baxter previously had made about how the last few days of the festival were going to get crazy, Baxter replied, “Yea, but they don’t know that.”
At an April 7th meeting, the group discussed blowing up a Klan or Nazi headquarters. The informant said he thought there was one in Wooster or Lodi, which is in "Southern Ohio," 45 minutes away (I will refrain from making comments about the state of public education in Ohio!). The group decided this wouldn't help their cause. Baxter "advised that it would not stop money flowing to the One Percent."

"Wright suggested getting a car that they can drive into the Federal Reserve Bank with C4, and blowing it up. Upon hearing Wright mention blowing up the Federal Reserve Bank, Baxter advised this is now higher scale, and wanted everyone to agree this was an open discussion."
Up twinkles if you agree this is a good idea?

The next meeting was on April 10th and they discussed other targets. They decided against the Cleveland Justice Center because they didn't want to harm "inmates" and anyways, there would be too much security. The next idea was to blow up a cargo ship in Lake Erie so they could "f--k up" some merchandise.
The group thought the Occupy May Day protest would provide not only a good distraction (police would be so busy with that nonsense they wouldn't notice a few random terrorists), but also an alibi:

“He suggested doing it during the “fest” or May 1st, because police will be downtown and not around the bridge. In order to create an alibi, Wright suggested they could be downtown and be seen, then get to the river to blow up something, and then go back downtown.”
Note that they understood that they would be "seen," implying that those at the protest would recognize them and later report they had been in attendance at the rally.

Much more damning is Baxter's confidence that he could lead the crowd away from the site of the explosion:
“Baxter stated that he is rallying in May Day so he could act as a decoy or diversion and move the crowd away from the river so that the police are removed away as well. He agreed that he could move them to another place such as city hall after Wright’s suggestion.”

Baxter was planning to use his position as a leader in Occupy Cleveland to divert attention away from the planned terror attack.

"Baxter stated that they may not have to drive downtown that day because there is talk about setting up a tent city."
In fact, Baxter and his fellow Occupiers were so enmeshed in the culture of Occupy Cleveland that they had to postpone the original pick-up time for the explosives in order to attend an Occupy "festival" in the city:

“Wright further told the CHS that the time of the delivery [of the C4] needed to be changed to either before the start of the festival on Saturday, or sometime on Sunday, April 29, 2012. Wright said that he, Baxter, and C.S. wanted to attend an event associated with the festival and could not make the meeting previously agreed upon.”
Ultimately, the group decided to blow  up the bridge in the Cuyahoga Valley National Recreational Area.



Their plan was to use the May Day Occupy protest as their alibi:

“Wright said that Baxter, (C.S.) [Connor Stevens] and he would be downtown at the festival and should be seen there to help establish an alibi.” 
On April 29th, they met at a hotel and purchased what they though was a duffel bag containing enough plastic explosives to take down a massive bridge:

"Approximately twenty minutes after Wright called the UCE, the UCE arrived at the location and the meeting was recorded. In sum and substance the UCE arrived and asked Wright, Baxter and Hayne for the money. Wright gave the UCE $450 and counted it quickly in front of him. The UCE gave Wright, Baxter and Hayne a duffel bag containing the vests, smoke grenades and gas masks. The UCE then opened the two black boxes containing two inert IEDs. "
Occupy Cleveland has the following statement on their Facebook page:

"While the group arrested Monday evening by the FBI were associated with Occupy Cleveland they were in no way representing or acting on behalf of Occupy Cleveland or the event that was planned for later today at the GE Lighting building. The May Day Event that was sponsored by Occupy Cleveland, the North Shore AFL-CIO, Cleveland Jobs with Justice, Fight for a Fair Economy and SEIU Local 1 has been cancelled because of the alleged actions of the autonomous group arrested last night. Occupy Cleveland has had affirmed principles of non-violence since its inception on October 6, 2011."
Of course, coming from a group that cannot arrive at a definition of "violence," a declaration that they are dedicated to "non-violence" gets lost in the noise.  For example:

"Some of us are morally opposed to handing someone over to the cops and consider it a violent act...I can tell you for a fact that at least one other prominent Occupier is strongly opposed to calling police, for the same reasons stated here. Even when someone has committed violence, this person says, putting them through the criminal justice system only imposes more violence."
While I'm not at all suggesting that everyone associated with the Occupy movement is a terrorist or that many (or even most) are not dedicated to non-violence,  it's now clear after today's event that it can and does harbor anarchists in its midst. Spend some time on their Facebook pages (and check out the profiles of the commenters) or read through their forums and you'll find that you can't swing a cat (or a dog if you're a Democrat) without hitting an anarchist. The Occupy movement's penchant for accepting everyone's viewpoints as equally valid and its unwillingness to say anything is wrong (except the 1% and the Republicans), creates a virile breeding ground for the kind of people who plot to blow up the bridges my husband drives over on his way to work in the morning.

We have to ask, how long before before one of these plots is successful? Though our law enforcement officials did an excellent job of conducting this investigation,  it seems like it's only a matter of time until one of them succeeds. When a group like Occupy Cleveland considers turning violent criminals over to police an act of violence itself, they must be considered complicit in whatever results from their inaction.      

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Pro-Life Senators Stand in the Way of Ending Nearly All Ohio Abortions

The year was 1985. I was working as a store manager at a shopping mall and after years as a party girl, had begun to take my Christian faith seriously. Whenever I did paperwork in the back room, I would listen to 640 WHLO out of Akron, which at that time was a Christian station. As 20-year-old young woman who had been raised in an agnostic, union-Democrat home, I had never—not even once—considered the issue of abortion in a serious way. Of course, like most girls my age, I had been taught in public school health class that abortion was a way to get rid of an unwanted pregnancy, and as such, it carried with it approximately the same moral implications of birth control pills. That is, approximately no moral implications.


That all changed for me when I was confronted with the horrific truth that abortion snuffs out a human life. That an actual baby, created in the image of God, dies in the process. I first heard that message from Dr. Jack Willke, who in 1985 had (if I'm recalling correctly) a weekly radio program that was syndicated and broadcast on WHLO. Dr. Willke didn't have a powerful speaking voice or impressive rhetorical skills, but his message could not be clearer: abortion stopped a beating heart and killed a human being.  Dr. Willke carefully explained both the biblical and the scientific reasons that abortion is a crime against humanity. I was instantly transformed from being agnostic on the abortion issue to being pro-life.  Instantly.





All these years later,  Dr. Willke is still fighting the good fight, trying to save unborn babies. This week, he has taken to the newspapers in Ohio, fighting for the Heartbeat Bill:


"I'm now 87-years-old and thought I would never live to see the end of abortion. I have renewed hope. After 40 years in the wilderness, we are a senate vote away from the Promised Land of  protecting babies whose heartbeat can be heard—more than a school bus full of children each day, tens of thousands of Ohio babies each year. Only one thing stands in the way of the most pro-life bill in America: those who call themselves "pro-life!"
The Heartbeat Bill passed the Ohio House last June. Since then, it has been stalled in the Republican-controlled Senate. Republican senators who ran on pro-life platforms and are now refusing to bring the bill to a vote.

Unfortunately, Ohio Right to Life, a de facto wing of the GOP establishment, has been complicit in blocking this bill (see my previous diary on this topic),  preferring to regulate abortion, saying that the bill would not hold up to a Supreme Court challenge and that there would be a danger of reaffirming Roe v. Wade.
Dr. Willke, an Ohio Right to Life Board member disagrees:


“While I used to believe there was a danger of reaffirming Roe v. Wade by passing such a protective bill, after 38 years of abortion on demand, I no longer believe that would be the result. Whether Roe is affirmed or not, the results are the same: Unborn babies are killed for any reason virtually any time until their birth. We must not wait any longer to protect babies in our state."
The Heartbeat Bill has widespread support both in Ohio and across the nation. The list of supporters includes Congressmen Jim Jordan and Steve Chabot, State Treasurer (and Senate candidate) Josh Mandel, Dr. James Dobson, Janet Folger, Ken Blackwell, Frank Pavone, Rep. Newt Gingrich, Sen. Rick Santorum, Gov. Rick Perry, Rep. Michele Bachmann, Rep. Louis Gohmert, Rep. Steve King, Gov. Mike Huckabee, Jay Sekulow, Tony Perkins, Gary Bauer, Grover Norquist....on and on.  The bill's supporters say it is the most supported bill in America.


The Ohio Senate now has the opportunity to pass historic legislation to make Ohio the state that pushes the first domino that topples the 40 years of reign of terror upon unborn babies in the United States.





The current makeup of the Ohio Senate is 21-12 in favor of the Republicans.

Only 17 votes are needed to pass the most consequential, monumental law related to human life since Roe v. Wade.  Pro-life Republicans are holding up the legislation.

Dr. Willke reminds them:
"Because they told us they would end abortion, we sacrificially wrote checks, tirelessly stuffed envelopes, made calls, knocked on doors, distributed ballot cards, and voted these legislators into office. We didn’t elect them to regulate abortion, but to end it. Ohio Senate Republicans can no longer call themselves “pro- life” while refusing to pass the fully protective Heartbeat Bill!"
Dr. Willke poignantly adds:
 "At 87, I may not have long to live,  but unborn babies with beating hearts have even less time. While the Republican Senate delays bringing this to a vote, babies die. Talk is cheap and abortion regulation is woefully inadequate."
There is also a move by some in the senate to completely neuter the bill by changing it to a mere informed consent law. This would completely cut the "heart" out of the Heartbeat Bill.


Republican senators who are blocking the bill (or trying to neuter it), while claiming to be pro-life, need to be called, emailed and held to account right now. As Dr. Willke said, babies are dying while these senators are strutting around crowing about what a great job they've done at "regulating" abortion.


Now is the time for political courage.


Contact the Ohio senators below and urge them bring the bill to a floor vote immediately. If your senator is not listed, you can find the contact information here.

Senate Pres. Tom Niehaus......614-466-8082     niehaus@ohiosenate.go


Pres. pro tempore Keith Faber........614-466-7584     faber@ohiosenate.gov


Whip Shannon Jones..614-466-9737      jones@ohiosenate.gov


Floor Leader Tom Patton........614-466-8056      patton@ohiosenate.gov


Scott Oelslager...614-466-0626      oelslager@ohiosenate.gov


Peggy Lehner.....614-466-4538       lehner@ohiosenate.gov


Dave Burke........614-466-8049       burke@ohiosenate.gov


Troy Balderson...614-466-8076    balderson@ohiosenate.gov


Kris Jordan........614-466-8086     jordan@ohiosenate.gov

Friday, March 30, 2012

Rubio Supporters Vent Their Frustration

Sen. Marco Rubio might be rethinking his endorsement of Mitt Romney about now. Yesterday, Rubio posted a couple items to his Facebook page, which had nothing whatsoever to do with Romney. The first was a video explaining the importance of repealing Obamacare. It was posted around 5:00 p.m. Wednesday. At first the comments were about Obamacare and the thread was a veritable Rubio love-fest:
Barbara Bannon DeNapoli Hobbs Keeping up the good work for your State of Florida and for the Citizens of the USA. We appreciate all that you have done, are doing, and will do in the future. Bless you Marco Rubio.

Wednesday at 19:36 ·  ·  2
Jose Heinsen Future American President right there, mark my words....
Wednesday at 19:43 · 

Alison Fleming Mr Vice President!! And in 8 years Mr President - I can only hope, pray, wish!!!
Wednesday at 21:35 ·  ·  2
Then, suddenly, during Hannity's show, as Rubio is making his announcement to endorse Romney, the tone changed. No more VP talk:

  • Ruth Saldana Rohr Bought by the establishment Marco, huh? I thought you were bold and fresh. Lost respect for you. Latinas for Santorum!!
    Wednesday at 21:47 ·  ·  8


  • Ruth Saldana Rohr How much did RINO Romney pay you? What did he promise you?
    Wednesday at 21:47 ·  ·  12


  • Joe Butner Marco Rubio, You have damaged your brand by supporting a Democrat like Mitt Romney, who always seems to struggle to tell the truth. I thought you were smarter than this! I am extremely disappointed in you. You should have never endorsed Etch a Sketch. He can NOT beat Obama!
    Wednesday at 22:01 ·  ·  11

  • Chris Crosby Marco, you just committed political suicide right before out TEA Party eyes!!!
    How you can profess that O'CommieCare must be repealed, then endorse the GodFather of it [DNS's words, not mine] is beyond my comprehension... Very, very disappointed in you...
    Wednesday at 22:02 ·  ·  15

  • Karen Sanders Bill Clinton is more conservative than Mitt Romney. What the heck are you thinking?
    Wednesday at 22:10 ·  ·  10
The thread weighed in at 248 comments, most of them complaining about Rubio's decisions to endorse Romney. Then on Thursday, Rubio posted a message in support of Ohio senate candidate, Josh Mandel:

Marco Rubio Just 2 days left and we have reached 58% of goal! Support Reclaim America PAC in its efforts to raise $20,000 to help elect Josh Mandel to the United States Senate. https://donate.reclaimamericapac.com/josh-mandel/
Unfortunately for Mandel, this message was lost in the 161 comments, almost of all of them expressing anger, disappointment, and rage at the endorsement. The most commonly used words were RINO, establishment, disappointed, and money.

I removed a few of the comments that were either off topic or used "salty" language, but pasted most of them below. Notice how few of them support this endorsement (you can also count the 'likes').  Many of them make reference to the Tea Party and express their sense of betrayal that their guy could do something like this. More than a few think there is money involved.

Whatever you think about this endorsement, I think we can all agree with the comment above that said Rubio has damaged his "brand" with this move. For all his lofty, Reaganesque speeches, the curtain has now been pulled back and we see that the Wizard of Oz is really a politician,  just like most of the rest of them.

On some level, at least to me, this disappointment is a little more profound because the Florida GOP and Charlie Christ played this same establishment extermination game against Rubio in 2010. He understands the game better than most and is willingly playing for the E-Team now.


History will tell if Rubio, the shrewd politician, risked too much with this endorsement. For the sake of the country, I hope his instincts are right this time. For now, his constituents and fans don't think so.

    • Adam Amick Sorry, Senator, but your endorsement of Mitt Romney leads me to believe that you/your PAC are not worthy of my money.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  12


    • Philip Durnin After last night, No.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  11


    • Brennan Boyack ‎^^LOL
      11 hours ago ·  ·  3


    • Phil Severin Screw you Marco
      11 hours ago ·  ·  6


    • Brennan Boyack Yeah Marco, I liked your page cuz I thought you supported liberty. Now I see you support Romney, sigh. *un-liked*
      11 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Mary Snyder-Nava I was never a fan of boehner and my previous posts in 2010 show this. I called his office and asked if he was being blackmailed. Honestly, I think all of them are. On Alex Jones show, yesterday, if you can believe Robert (Bob) Fletcher, he bears out my suspicions. saying, in part, 'writing to your congressman is comedy' to them. i might agree as when the non establishment people were sent to the House, the establ. about had a cow. The newbies hadn't been 'compromised' yet and could not be controlled.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  3


    • Mia Frederiksen What Kevin said!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Ruth Saldana Rohr Sorry, since you turned moderate/lib and turned your back on the base that elected you, you can't be trusted.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  8


    • Debbie Worthman Maritato Why not give him some of the money Mitt just gave you. This poor guy should walk away from your support, you just showed your true colors!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Jim Gregory Marco is the greatest!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Deborah Owings Googe Would you rather have Obummer again Brennen?
      11 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Kevin Delaney Ask Mitt, maybe he has some money for you....I don't.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  10


    • Deborah Owings Googe Not a tremendous fan of Mitt myself, I want Obummer out of DC!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • Maria Mcginnis I dont live in Florida,but after picking Mitt,I would have to think twice,,Romney will not be able to debate Obama,,
      11 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Rich Scarpati Romney-Rubio 2012!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Brennan Boyack Deborah, YES!!! A wolf in wolfs clothing is easily protected against. A wolf in sheeps clothing is a lot more dangerous
      11 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Andrew Coffield Disappointed by your presidential nod, but I still support Mandel. If anyone else does, go to jobs.joshmandel.com to donate.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • William Eisentraeger You as VP will seal the deal..
      11 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Jack Bratton Jr I am severely disappointed in you Mr. Rubio. You are no friend of the Tea Party. Nominating Romney is a vote for Obama.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  11


    • Brennan Boyack I am planning on writing in Ron Paul....

      I am also considering just voting Obama... since all the other neocon loons are a lot more scary then him.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Maria Mcginnis You should have supported a better Pres,candidate,,Someone like Newt,he is smart an would have Obama sucking his finger during a debate!!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • William Eisentraeger Oh please,Romney will mop the floor debating Obama..
      11 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Gavin Rozzi Ruck Fomney
      11 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Stephanie Brown Wow, people! He has a right to endorse a candidate! It does not change the great work he is doing! The ultimate goal is to defeat Obama! Get over yourselves and look to the greater goal! Can you actually say any of the nominees are the perfect candidate or who you wanted to be running? I can't. Senator Rubio sees that having this thing drag out to August is a bad thing for our party and our chances of defeating Obama. We can not afford another 4 years of obama executive ordering his way through with the opportunity to destroy this country for a lifetime by appointing 2-3 more supreme court justices. I will happily, Contribute, Senator. I also hope you are tapped for the VP nominee and I hope you accept!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  7


    • Judy Hensley Purkey You guys do not know what u r talking about. Marco is good for America NOBama is not wake up!!!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Mike Kaiser Rubio, how can you sell us out by supporting that RINO Romney? A MA Republican is still a Democrat by most of the rest of the country. Santorum is the only one deserving the nomination and the seat in the White House!!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  6


    • Brennan Boyack The ultimate goal is NOT to defeat obama *smh*
      11 hours ago · 


    • Adam Amick This is REAL simple... You should wait and endorse the nominee the PEOPLE choose, rather than trying to sway opinion of your TEA Party supporters to back the Moderate/Liberal cum Conservative Romney.

      After all... He either LIED to the people of Massachusetts to get elected in arguably the most liberal state in the country, or he's lying now... Either way, Mitt Romney is a LIAR!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  6


    • Kevin Sliwa if you think romney can beat obama you are delusional.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • Chuck Reichmuth Reclaim America? Lets see...Rubio voted yes to extend the Patriot Act, voted yes for NDAA, co sponsored PIPA/SOPA, Voted yes for 30,000 US drones. The best way we can reclaim America is to get idiots like this out of office!!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  7


    • Zak Hill This is the PAC that supports Maobomney the Massachusetts socialist!!! Do Not support it!!!!!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  3


    • James Denney Ithought you were a conservative. How could you endorse RINORomney?
      11 hours ago ·  ·  9


    • Debbie Worthman Maritato what happens now Mr. Rubio, the tea party was instrumental in getting you elected, you turned your back on them, who is going to help you in the next election, you better hope Romney offers you a job if he ends up winning, if not possibly there is something for you at Bain
      11 hours ago ·  ·  9


    • Theresa White Not if he shares your immigration views. Marco, you had me until you spouted your legalization views. NO WAY
      11 hours ago ·  ·  3


    • Jason Crisp I heard that bogus baloney you were spewing this morning about what a sharp contrast Romney is to Obama. What a crock.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  9


    • Eagle's Stare You are a sellout by endorsing BIG GOVERNMENT Romney. It looks like you made a deal with the devil by returning the endorsement he made for you. Don't forget you were elected into office by the tea party, and you just alienated your gravy train.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  9


    • Stephanie Brown Get real, Adam! Also, Romney does have a conservative record. He was able to balance the MA state budget with an 86% dem legislature w/out raising taxes! He understands the difference between states rights and fed rights... If ultra conservative Ann Coulter can not only come around and support Gov Romney, but also right all about the good things he has done, then I can too. He knows how to turn over a failing business - and YES that means shutting down departments and cutting costs! He is the right man at the right time. We can keep him on the right by sending reinforcements to the Senate so conservative bills get sent to the Presidents desk.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • James Mertens Thanks for endorsing Goldman Sachs.. Obvious where you stand. People will remember this. Hope you thought about it before doing so. If you are second guessing yourself, you should be.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Ruth Saldana Rohr Good Job, Marco Rubio. You have united- Ron Paul's, Rick Santorum's, and Newt Gingrich's followers. ha ha
      11 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Cleta Goerl Brookstein I'm deeply disappointed that you nominated Mitt Romney. I do not feel I can donate anything to you now.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  7


    • Theo Arechiga Marco, if you hadn't endorsed Romney I would have donated.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  8


    • Stephanie Brown Sometimes you need to think past the immediate moment.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Ta Mauney I hope he does not back ROMNEY !!
      11 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Pat Richesin Maria look at it this way, should Rubio be on the ticket with Romney, Obama can not debate him, Rubio will kick his butt, just like Palin did. And a Romney-Rubio ticket would be a winner, no matter what.
      11 hours ago ·  ·  3


    • Wendi Tanisha Crain GOOD JOB RUBIO. Nothing wrong with choosing who you think will do the best! Shame you are criticized for your freedom to choose and not be BULLIED by those who have diff OPINIONS! Can you come to CA... we need you LMAO
      11 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • Diana Downs What a bunch of cry babies. Rubio knows that we have to stop running against each other if we hope to defeat Obama. Anyone with half a brain knows that. Romney is the only one with a chance at the nomination now and the only one with a chance to win in November. Thank you Senator for putting country first.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • Sean Riley I really wish you hadn't supported Mitt Romney.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  7


    • Kelly McKay Hey Rubio. I thought you were conservative. Then I year you came out for Romney. That doesn't sound conservative to me.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  10


    • Stephanie Brown Romney will be able to debate Obama... So much ignorance on this thread..
      10 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • Arlene Matush very dissapointed in you Rubio.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  6


    • Helene Henkel It's a shame you endorsed Romney. Oh well.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  7


    • Robert L. Bryant Wow, people sure are crazy these days. Look, I'm a Santorum supporter, and if Rubio thinks Romney is better for the job of POTUS, then he and I have a disagreement. You know what though? It's one of the very, very few things that we disagree on. Here's a news flash: no two people are going to agree on everything!
      10 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Donna Mauney I am disappointed in your support of Romney too!! I could never donate or support you in any way after THAT endorsement! You just lost all conservative credentials IMO!
      10 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Christopher L. Biagi Sr. Mitt Who? Marco Who? Tell you what ask your buddies Mitt or Obama for some cash... oh wait Obama won't have flexibility until after the election... But I bet Mitt greased your palms real good... I would not send any PAC affiliated with you a penny if my own life depended on it.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • Ruth Saldana Rohr Yes Oromney will be able to debate Obama, and when Mitt attacks Obamacare,.........
      10 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Jesse Cole Penick Sellout
      10 hours ago ·  ·  3


    • Michael-Daphney Cordeiro Sorry Marco, you betrayed those of us who thought you were a real warrior for liberty. By endorsing Mitt and his Big government libreral ways, its obvious you wussed out so you could gain acceptance by the RHINOS of the Republican party. Being a warrior means to say things that are true, even if its hard.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  8


    • Karen Smith It seems to me that if people really want OBOOGER voted out, and Americans really want to take their country back... Wouldn't it make sense to drop your doubtful attitudes, because you're candidate is not at the top, and get behind the candidate that is? If we swallow our pride,and bite our tongues, can you imagine what message WE could send to OBOOGER?
      10 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Karen Lindsey Now Mr. Rubio you will learn what happens when you dont listen to the people and accept payoff money from Romney. How much did he pay you?
      10 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Ryan Forkel As with many people here, I am so disappointed you chose to endorse Romney, Mr. Rubio. Why do people think that he has been so up and down in the polls? Because people are looking for someone besides Romney. Anybody but Romney...And if he does become the nominee (which I hope does not happen) and if he offers you VP, don't do it.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  3


    • Alan Russell Hope for a brokered convention. I can't believe that after the tea party rally's of 2009-10, the republicans did there best to not put up a Conservative. I don't know what I will do if there is not a brokered convention and a Conservative put up as the nominee. Ryan, DeMint, Several Governor's might do. If not, I don't think I will vote and just take the 4 more years of obama and the death of America...
      10 hours ago · 


    • Jeff Eyssallenne Wow. The Ron Paul supporter with 30 Facebook accounts is busy today! Go Rubio! Go Romney!
      10 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • J Alex Hart Rubio can't do it on his own so he's sucking up to the money train. Rubio???? If you need 20,000 why isn't your buddy Romney stepping up? Ha, even he knows you are impotent and neutralized by selling out to the left every time you vote in chambers.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Ginger Sides Springer When you sold us out to Romney, we learned you can't be trusted either! Just like the rest of them that we were counting on! You have all betrayed us!
      10 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • David Tolias When the debt bubble bursts,like Ron Paul has predicted and a depression sets in, these politicians who caused this mess are gonna catch hell. Rubio, get a real job.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Ruth Saldana Rohr Loving the unity RINO Rubio is bringing to the party.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  3


    • Kevin Martin Trouble in coocooville??? I LOVE IT!!!! Muhahahaha :-)
      10 hours ago · 


    • Rebecca Lakerfan Ask Romney to give some of his money.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Jean-Michel Ormand lol, People are getting tired of wasting money on coocoos like Marco Rubio!
      10 hours ago · 


    • Roy Wallen I loved Marco Rubio, but I question him seriously now, after a Conservative like him endorsed Romney over Santorum.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Linda Womack Woods Forget what you have heard on TV about the the Republicans not liking who they have to choose from. I think we have alot of good canidates to choose from!! It is hard to support just one they all have good qualities. Romney will be great to get us all back to work. Jobs will improve all the other problems. If I can't have Newt, Romney is wonderful !!
      10 hours ago · 


    • Roy Wallen I seriously lost respect for Rubio when I heard he backs Romney which is the same as Obama!
      10 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Hyam Solomon Tea Party turncoat .
      10 hours ago ·  ·  7


    • Brian Huggins Just browsing through the comments here and It's sounding more and more like the complaints of whiny liberals (which is usually the case on facebook). Sack up guys. The point is to get obama out of office. You guys sound like a bunch of whining libs.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Roy Wallen Linda, Do you're research! Romney was the CEO of a company in Kansas City, MO, and he completely bankrupted the company and the company completely went under, yet Romney wrapped all his wealth in overseas accounts and made out like a bandit!
      10 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Joshua Collins I for one applaud his decision to endorse Romney.
      10 hours ago · 


    • Aloha Sue Reclaim America and you back Romney?? Kind of an oxymoron, isn't it?
      10 hours ago ·  ·  11


    • Thom Brasuell ‎@ Stephanie Brown I am not sure where you get your information from, but Taxes increased in MA over $700 Million with Romney as Governor. Additionally he took over $500 million in federal tax dollars (from me and you) to start ORomneyCare! Senator Rubio, big mistake!
      10 hours ago · 


    • Hyam Solomon The RINO's just wants to nominate anothe eunuch like McCain and Rubio is one of them .
      10 hours ago ·  ·  7


    • Kerrick White Thanks for supporting a RINO like Romney, after everything we went through and accomplished the last 3 years with the new awakening among conservatives. Sell out traitor! Just like the rest of the liars in Washington!
      10 hours ago ·  ·  6


    • Brian Huggins I find it hard to believe that so many of you complaining on this thread think its such a GREAT idea to do what Newt and Santorum have made clear is their plan which is to have it out on the convention floor 2 months before the big day... Let's get real folks.
      10 hours ago · 


    • Denise Bussey Wendi shame on the elite establishment Republican leadership and media for shoving Romney down our throats. Trying to convenience us he is the only one. Taking down good people one by one during this primary race. Dirty underhanded lies all over the place and Mitt "Oh I don't have control over that.".... Well then you are not our leader thanks for exposing your self now as having poor leadership qualities. Rubio you have been like a Judas Iscariot. There is nothing I distain more than someone who says they are one thing but turn into the opposite once they have what they wanted from you. I hope you enjoy the vote I gave you it will be the last. How do you look yourself in the mirror? Shame Shame Shame. Those of you on here that referred to Ron Pauls people saying these negtive things you wish it was so. Rubio need to enjoy his benefits now. He won't be re elected.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Richard S. Traegler Jr. Just another phony liar. Save the rhetoric and good luck going down in flames as Romney's VP. Florida is apparently full of BS artists and you are the king of all. Sad, sad sad.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • Robert L. Bryant Hey, conservatives, just because he supports Romney doesn't make Josh Mandel any less of a good candidate himself. Good grief. I'm embarrassed by those on here that call themselves conservative.

      Politics have become ridiculous.
      10 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Brian James Don't expect Rubio to back his constituents when making decisions, as we can see today he only follows the money.

      Wonder how much Goldman Sachs paid him for that Romney endorsement.
      9 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Eric Armetta Why did you endorse Mitt Romney? You were to be the new, fresh different guy. Not going with the estiblshed elite. I'm very sad.
      9 hours ago ·  ·  7


    • Stephanie Brown Eric - and who of the current candidates is "new" and "fresh." Get a grip!
      9 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Ruth Saldana Rohr I'm so embarrassed that I was so impressed with you. Bold and Fresh my foot. You are an establishment RINO.
      9 hours ago ·  ·  7


    • Shawn Campbell Showed your true colors with your moderate mitt endorsement. I will not be supporting anymore of your endorsements or your next bandwaggonjumping campaign.
      9 hours ago ·  ·  8


    • Isabel Matos Marco, Im from Miami and I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR ROMNEY. I know you dont have "un pelo de bobo" but remember this: You got where you are based on your merits not on DC insiders. There is nothing wrong with political aspirations but you dont owe the Bushes anything! They need you more than you need them. Dont let ambition blind or make you forget that We-the-People are the the BOss. Not them. The future of the Republican Party is at stake. There is no appetite for any type of corruption. Give whatever they gave YOU back! THe GOP who has started a war v. us and the TEA PArty wil push back and watch you closely. If you associate yourself to the Progressive agenda (Jeb BUsh, Romney) it will tarnish your brand.
      9 hours ago ·  ·  8


    • Oscar Gonzalez Disapointed in your endorsement of Romney.
      9 hours ago ·  ·  8


    • Michael Marty Matarazzo will he support newest Dream Act scam!
      9 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Briana Sams Wow, am I disappointed in YOU Mr. Rubio! Mitt Romney shouldn't even be on a republican ticket but I truly thought you belonged there. WRONG! Nice fake job! I hope you don't plan on Tea Party support ever again. (I'm sure MoneyBagsMitt made up for that for now) Enjoy your day on TV while it lasts. Your days as a NON public servant are numbered fella.
      9 hours ago ·  ·  8


    • Jackie Lewis Melton ty rubio for endorsing mitt..santorum is big government,not a true conservative.mitt is the true conservative in the race !
      9 hours ago · 


    • Michael McMillin ‎....and to think, I was seriously considering a donation after payday tomorrow.
      9 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Ruth Saldana Rohr Michael mcmillin, please give your donation to Santorum. He needs it to fight RINO Rubio, and the rest of the GOP establishment trying to take our vote away from us. I'll be making another donation to Rick tomorrow.
      9 hours ago ·  ·  6


    • Steven Eddings I wIll not vote for anyone endorsed by rubio...you have demonstrated a pIss poor judgment
      9 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Janet Gilbert You all might want to wake up to the fact that the republican party has to win the Senate, keep the House and take the Oval office, or it WILL be over for conservatives of all degrees in this country and maybe around the world. Romney may not be your cup 'o tea, mine either, but I'll damn sure take him over obama. And if you choose to vote 3rd party< if Romney is indeed the rep. candidate, let me thank you ( tons of sarcasm) in advance for putting obama back in. And I fear it would not be for only 4 more.
      8 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Briana Sams Santorum is ridiculous as is Mitt Romney. Want a true conservative with a proven track record Newt is the man with the proof and the ability. But I just figured out Rubio isn't interested in Conservative values. He proved that by backing a liberal that can't get elected.
      8 hours ago · 


    • Kathy Kennedy O'Brien ‎@Janet I will hold my nose and vote for Romney and I agree that Romney would be better than Obama, but just barely. I resent the fact that once more the GOP establishment has shoved another RINO down our throats like McCain. And we all know how well that worked last time. I share your fear that we would be stuck with Obama for more than 4 years. I think he would just appoint himself king for life. It's too bad that the spineless Republicans who are supposed to be representing (like Marco Rubio) us have sold us out.
      8 hours ago · 


    • Gloria Donley Being a politician is a job so Rubio is just climbing up the ladder by endorsing Romney. What is so special about Rubio anyway?
      8 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Kathy Kennedy O'Brien I was shocked and saddened to learn of your endorsement of Romney. You are a big disappointment Senator Rubio. I have been talking you up to all my friends and family and saying that you are the hope for the country's future. But you are just another RINO whose principals can be bought. Or maybe you had us all fooled and you never had any to begin with. I am done with you. Such a shame - you had so much potential.
      8 hours ago ·  ·  6


    • Camille Larsen Governor Romney is focused on restoring American greatness and making Barack Obama a one-term President. Senator Rubio, your endorsement is a major milestone in that effort. THANKS FOR STANDING WITH MITT!!!
      8 hours ago · 


    • Steven Eddings ‎@janet.... voting for the lesser of two evils has worked so well in the past right? I for one am tired of voting for the best of two douchenozzles...this time my conscience will be clear, ron paul or nothing
      8 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Catherine Walker I vote according to my core convictions which I thought you shared. The GOP doesn't speak for me. Get the message: "We Don't Want Romney!" But, thank you for showing who you really are...it will be good to know the next time I vote. a Floridian Conservative.
      8 hours ago ·  ·  9


    • Vincenzo Greenbay Packers Barone Keep it up Go Mitt
      8 hours ago · 


    • Wendy Crisp Unliking your page for you supporting Mitt Romney the RINO. So disappointed in you.
      8 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Connie Kanakanake Ledford I hope that Floridians remember all the "outsiders" who got elected for NOT being establishment and then endorsed the Boston RINO lib Romney. Remember them when they come up again for elections ... Rubio, Atwater, Bondi, etc ...
      7 hours ago ·  ·  7


    • Ellie Jean Bryan WIlliard Mitt Romney?? We do Not want or need a Moderate Liberal. You just ruined your self Marco Rubio.
      7 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • Corlana McCartney Can't believe you sold out to RINO Romney. What a waste. I'm "unliking" your page. Santorum 2012 Rick Santorum is a genuine conservative.
      6 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • Mitch Feldman I lost a lot of respect for you, if you are a true Conservative how could you endorse a liberal like Romney over Santorum.
      6 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • Julie Schwartz I've lost all respect for you. How could you turn your back on the Tea Party, which elected you? I bet you're hoping to be Mitt's VP, and that's why you endorsed him. Shame on you.
      5 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Jeff Morgan Thanks, but I will NOT be supporting this. Maybe Josh is tremendous, but after that horrific Romney endorsement of yoursm all other endorsements are suspect.
      5 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Joe Butner Yeah Marco, I wouldn't give you a dime my man! You should go ask your Sugar Daddy "Mittens" for an allowance.
      4 hours ago ·  ·  3


    • Francine Flood So disappointed in your endorsement of Romney! Rick is the one true conservative that can beat Obama! Santorum 2012!
      4 hours ago ·  ·  4


    • Charles Manning You're joking right? You endorsed the most liberal presidential candidate!
      4 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Lynn Metzger I was so proud to see your speech at the SBA dinner a very good one too..and I had hoped you would endorse the people's choice (Rick Santorum) instead of the media choice (Romney)...Romney is not as well liked by the people and I"m sure you think you are helping...however, look at the voting map...go watch Rick Santorum campaign...I would LOVE to see you be his running mate...but alas, I am very, very disappointed in your choice of endorsement. I will be voting for Rick Santorum for many reasons...the one being he is a true conservative who lives out his conservative values and we the people trust him...he wins way more counties than Romney does in every state primary! I really hope you change your mind b/c many Santorum supporters are disappointed in your choice.
      3 hours ago ·  ·  3


    • Donna Corvino I am very, very disappointed in you on your endorsing Mitt!!! Are you crazy??? What ever happens to the People's choice & not the media choice??? I am guessing you would like to see ORomneycare shove down our throats too!!!! I hope wake up & see Rick Santorum is the best choice!!! Now I won't be supporting you for any of your re-election campaign!!! I WILL STILL BE VOTING FOR RICK SANTORUM ALL THE WAY!!! SANTORUM 2012!!
      3 hours ago ·  ·  2


    • Eric Armetta at Stephanie, he is that guy. Read my comment again.
      3 hours ago · 


    • Hyam Solomon to the extent Romney is capable of focus perhaps Camille . Not acceptable . Romney is always a half shaken etch a sketch . He is cluelessly naive and has the sincerity of McCain , the last RINO king . . Booo Marco .
      3 hours ago · 


    • Briana Sams I sure don't know where you folks get off calling Santorum a conservative. He likes raising taxes as much as Mitt. The only true conservative (documented proof) in this race is Newt Gingrich. I'm still not over my shock and disappointment with Mr. Rubio. But I've seen a few people flip as well that really shocked me.
      3 hours ago · 


    • Karla Jerry AndSons I saw you on TV a while back saying that you do not believe in Endorsements, that you think that the people need to make the choices, I thought, wow ,there is smart man. Now you come with this late endorsement???? Anyone endorsing at this point is just to please the establishment. The plan right now is to put pressure on the candidates so you can close the deal for Romney. If you had endorsed before the Florida vote, it would had been fine. Right now, you are just proving that you are more for the republican party than for the people.
      3 hours ago ·  ·  5


    • Bob James Wait a minute...why are we working to elect conservatives if you are supporting Mitt Romney? That doesn't make sense!
      2 hours ago ·  ·  1


    • Shirley Ramsey So...why would he NOT support Mitt Romney...I know, when this all started "everyone" was more conservative...as it turns out and the true stories come out, turns out Gov. Romney is the most conservative...and HONEST!!! Honesty and experience are great virtues, he has been highly successful at EVERY endeavor in his lifetime...It' time people got over whatever the heck bothers them about Romney (stupid stuff like "he doesn't connect", Rich, Mormon, etc. and look at his CREDENTIALS!!! Much better than the other two who have LIVED off their DC Cronies since QUITTING and Being VOTED OUT!! Take the time to actually READ about Romney...not just repeat what you "heard"!!
      2 hours ago · 


    • Reyesmontiel Pedro Como esta Marco? espero que todo este bien, le deseo suerte en la justa que se aproxima. Yo por ahora estoy en Afghanistan sirviendo al pais, soy SGT en el army. Me da gusto que este apoyando a Josh mandel, yo lo he estado apoyando tambien. cuando fui de vacaciones aproveche para votar.
      2 hours ago · 


    • Shirley Ramsey Oh, and By the Way...THANK YOU MARCO RUBIO....I know you don't take your endorsement lightly!!!!
      2 hours ago · 


    • Jeff Dimmick So sorry to hear that you are endorsing the truly non-conservative candidate Mitt Romney. Many of us had hoped that you would take a stand against the GOP country club establishment and the main stream media's choice Mitt. You promised in the past not to become a part of the Washington "establishment", but by your endorsement you have compromised your principles. If Mitt does in fact become the GOP candidate you will watch a repeat of 2008 and wish that you had stood beside a true conservative instead!
      2 hours ago ·